Pruitt v. Indiana, 548 U.S. 910 (2006). · Go Syfert
Pruitt v. Indiana, 548 U.S. 910 (2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Troy Jay Rhodes v. Civil Commitment Unit for Sexual Offenders (iand, 2026-03-27)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Troy Jay Rhodes v. Civil Commitment Unit for Sexual Offenders
N.D. Iowa · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
See Michau v. Charleston County, S.C., 434 F.3d 725 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 910 (2006): However, [plaintiff] is presently being detained under the SVPA, which creates a system of civil, not criminal, detention. ... see also Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 365-69 (1997) (concluding that Kansas’s Sexually Violent Predators Act established civil rather than criminal detention scheme).
discussed Cited "see" Bruce Evan Martin v. State of Iowa; Bruce Evan Martin v. State of Iowa
N.D. Iowa · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Michau v. Charleston County, S.C., 434 F.3d 725 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 910 (2006): However, [plaintiff] is presently being detained under the SVPA, which creates a system of civil, not criminal, detention. ... see also Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 365-69 (1997) (concluding that Kansas’s Sexually Violent Predators Act established civil rather than criminal detention scheme).
discussed Cited "see" Adrian P. Jerrell v. State of Indiana
Ind. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pruitt v. State, 834 N.E.2d 90, 120 (Ind. 2005) (rejecting the defendant’s argument that requiring his opportunity to speak take place at the close of his case at the penalty phase “allowed the state an opportunity to rebut his claims and this sequence thwarted the purpose of the statutory right to allocution,” because the defendant “had an opportunity to speak on his own behalf” and his statutory right was therefore preserved), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 910 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" Sweet v. Northern Neck Regional Jail
E.D. Va. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Michau v. Charleston County, S.C., 434 F.3d 725 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 910 , 126 S.Ct. 2936 , 165 L.Ed.2d 961 (2006). . 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is u…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lawrence (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pmitt v. State, 834 N.E.2d 90,114-15 (Ind. 2005) (“Indiana [constitution requires the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant voluntarily waived his rights, and that the defendant’s confession was voluntarily given” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert, denied, 548 U.S. 910 , 126 S. Ct. 2936 , 165 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PRUITT
v.
INDIANA.
05-10540.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 2006.
548 U.S. 910
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Certiorari denied.