green
Positive treatment
11.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Velez, D.
See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 603 Pa. 92 , 982 A.2d 483 (2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 , 130 S.Ct. 2415 , 176 L.Ed.2d 932 (2010) (providing where appellant fails to preserve weight of evidence challenge in trial court, weight claim is waived because appellate court has nothing to review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. R.L.
See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 603 Pa. 92, 110 , 982 A.2d 483, 494 (2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 , 130 S.Ct. 2415 , 176 L.Ed.2d 932 (2010) (holding where appellant fails to preserve weight of evidence challenge in trial court, weight claim is waived because appellate court has nothing to review); In re K.L.S., 594 Pa. 194 , 197 n.3, 934 A.2d 1244 , 1246 n.3 (2007) (stating where issues are waived on appeal, we should affirm rather than quash appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Michaels, S.
See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 492 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010). -7- J-S60039-19 3701(a)(1)(i), “[a] person is guilty of robbery if, in the course of committing a theft, he: (i) inflicts serious bodily injury upon another[.]” 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(b)(i).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Deloatch, N.
See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 494 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010). 9 Following the May 11, 2016, sentence, the Commonwealth filed a motion for reconsideration of sentence and, on May 26, 2016, at a hearing on the motion, - 13 - J-S65019-17 brief a statement of reasons relied upon for appeal pursuant to Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki, 522 A.2d 17 (Pa. 1987), and Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f).10 Therefore, we must determine whether he has raised a substantial question justifying our review.
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Lemke, M.
See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 494 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Ford, K.
In determining whether evidence of other prior bad acts is admissible, the trial court is obliged to balance the probative value of such evidence against its prejudicial impact. [Id.; accord, Pa.R.E. 403.7] Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 497 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Kralik, S.
See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 494 (Pa. 2009), cert denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010). -6- J-A09005-17 prior criminal history, and psychological reports presented during the decertification hearing that found he was amenable to rehabilitation.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of J.B., Appeal of: Comm
See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 603 Pa. 92, 110 , 982 A.2d 483, 494 (2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 , 130 S.Ct. 2415 , 176 L.Ed.2d 932 (2010) (holding waiver was appropriate remedy despite the fact the trial court addressed the merits of the adult criminal appellant’s weight of the evidence claim, which was raised for the first time in his Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of J.B., Appeal of: Comm
See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 603 Pa. 92, 110 , 982 A.2d 483, 494 (2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 , 130 S.Ct. 2415 , 176 L.Ed.2d 932 (2010) (holding waiver was appropriate remedy despite the fact the trial court addressed the merits of the adult criminal appellant’s weight of the evidence claim, which was raised for the first time in his Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Mitchell, W.
A12033/ 19 S.Ct. 164 (2014); see also Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 497-498 (Pa. 2009) (finding that cautionary instructions were sufficient to overcome the prejudicial effect of prior bad acts evidence), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Levengood, S.
Moreover, we emphasize that our supreme court has repeatedly recognized that “when examining the potential for undue prejudice, a cautionary jury instruction may ameliorate the prejudicial effect of the proffered evidence.” Commonwealth v. Hairston, 84 A.3d 657, 666 (Pa. 2014) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 135 S.Ct. 164 (2014); see also Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 497-498 (Pa. 2009) (finding that cautionary instructions were sufficient to overcome the prejudicial effect of prior bad acts evidence), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Richards, E.
All such objections shall be made beyond the hearing of the jury.” Pa.R.Crim.P. 647(C); see also Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 892 A.2d 483 , 505 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010); Commonwealth v. Montalvo, 956 A.2d 926, 935-936 (Pa. 2008), cert. denied, 556 U.S. 1186 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Jones, A.
S67005/16 135 S.Ct. 164 (2014) (citations omitted); see also Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 497-498 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010) (finding that cautionary instructions were sufficient to overcome the prejudicial effect of prior bad acts evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Smallwood, A.
S52008/16 135 S.Ct. 164 (2014) (citations omitted); see also Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 497-498 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010) (finding that cautionary instructions were sufficient to overcome the prejudicial effect of prior bad acts evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Adams, N.
See Commonwealth v. Burno, 94 A.3d 956, 977 (Pa. 2014) (stating juries are presumed to follow trial court’s instructions); see also Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 497 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010) (concluding cautionary instructions ameliorated any undue prejudice caused by introduction of prior bad acts evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Gamble, J.
See Commonwealth v. Burno, 94 A.3d 956, 977 (Pa. 2014) (stating juries are presumed to follow trial court’s instructions); see also Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 497 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 (2010) (concluding cautionary instructions ameliorated any undue prejudice caused by introduction of bad acts evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Kinard
Id.; see also Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 603 Pa. 92, 115 , 982 A.2d 483, 497 (2009) (evidence of prior beatings by defendant relevant to show lack of accident or mistake at trial of beating death of his stepdaughter), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1111 , 130 S.Ct. 2415 , 176 L.Ed.2d 932 (2010); Commonwealth v. Fisher, 452 Pa.Super. 564 , 682 A.2d 811, 816 (prior agreement not to sell property he did not own was admissible at defendant’s trial for real estate fraud scheme), appeal denied, 546 Pa. 691 , 687 A.2d 376 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Manuel T. Ruffin
v.
North Carolina Department of Corrections
v.
North Carolina Department of Corrections
No. 09-9435.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 931
Published
Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 841.