green
Positive treatment
11.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Batts
(2×)
See Sulli van v. Florida, 560 U.S. 181 , 130 S.Ct. 2059 , - L.Ed.2d -(2010) (per curiam). .
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Ortiz
See Sullivan v. Florida, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2059 , — L.Ed.2d-(mem.) (2010). 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sullivan
v.
Florida
v.
Florida
08-7621.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 2010.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 560 U. S. ____ (2010) 1
Per Curiam
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________
No. 08–7621 _________________
JOE HARRIS SULLIVAN, PETITIONER v. FLORIDA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT [May 17, 2010]
PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered.