green
Positive treatment
11.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Hedlund v. Charles Ryan
(2×)
See Towery v. Ryan, 673 F.3d 933 , 944–45 (9th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1738 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
In re South African Apartheid Litigation
See - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 472 , 181 L.Ed.2d 292 (2011). . — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1738 , 182 L.Ed.2d 270 (2012). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan
See Towery v. Ryan, 673 F.3d 933, 942-43 (9th Cir. 2012) cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1738 (2012) (separately analyzing two prongs of actual abandonment or “serious breach of loyalty” and distinguishing Holland, which involved violations of fundamental canons of professional responsibility, from Towery’s circumstances, which did not).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan
(2×)
See Towery v. Ryan, 673 F.3d 933, 942-43 (9th Cir. 2012) cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1738 (2012) (separately analyzing two prongs of actual abandonment or “serious breach of loyalty” and distinguishing Holland, which involved violations of fundamental canons of professional responsibility, from Towery’s circumstances, which did not).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan
See Towery v. Ryan, 673 F.3d 933, 943 (9th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1738 (2012) (separately analyzing two prongs of actual abandonment or “serious breach of loyalty” and distinguishing Holland, which involved violations of fundamental canons of professional responsibility, from Towery’s circumstances, which did not).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan
See Towery v. Ryan, 673 F.3d 933, 943 (9th Cir. 2012) cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1738 (2012) (separately analyzing two prongs of actual abandonment or 'serious breach of loyalty' and distinguishing Holland, which involved violations of fundamental canons of professional responsibility, from Towery's circumstances, which did not).
cited
Cited "see"
Weisskopf v. United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, Inc.
See Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1738, 1738 , 182 L.Ed.2d 270 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holocaust Victims of v. Erste Group Bank
See Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir.2010), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 472 , 181 L.Ed.2d 292 (2011), calendared for reargument,-U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1738 , 182 L.Ed.2d 270 (2012). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Holocaust Victims of v. OTP Bank
See Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir.2010), cert. granted, -U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 472 , 181 L.Ed.2d 292 (2011) (No. 10-1491), calendared for reargument, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1738 , 132 L.Ed.2d 270 (2012). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Velez v. Sanchez
See Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.,-U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1738 , 182 L.Ed.2d 270 (2012) (mem.) (directing parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether the ATS "allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States”). 7 .We recognize our disagreement with the Ninth Circuit, which holds that ATS jurisdiction is proper as long as the allegations are not "wholly insubstantial and frivolous.” Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC, 487 F.3d 1193, 1200 (9th Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitte…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thurmond
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 11-9083 (11A839).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 2012.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave .to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari before judgment dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.