green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
15.2 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
"Norwood IV "
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
New England Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
norwood iv
discussed
Cited "see"
Binyam Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.
See El- Masri, 479 F.3d at 312 (coming to the same conclusion in a related and comparable case), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 947 (2007).12 12 In El-Masri, the Supreme Court declined to review the Fourth Cir- cuit’s dismissal of similar claims against the various United States govern- ment and corporate actors alleged to be more directly responsible for the rendition and interrogation programs at issue here.
examined
Cited "see"
Binyam Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.
(4×)
See El-Masri, 479 F.3d at 312 (coming to the same conclusion in a related and comparable case), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 947 , 128 S.Ct. 373 , 169 L.Ed.2d 258 (2007). 12 We reach this conclusion because all seven of plaintiffs’ claims, even if taken as true, describe Jeppesen as providing logistical support in a broad, complex process, certain aspects of which, the government has persuaded us, are absolutely protected by the state secrets privilege.
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Central Intelligence Agency
See El-Masri v. United States, 6 479 F.3d 296, 305 (4th Cir.) ("In some situations, a court may 7 conduct an in camera examination of the actual information sought 8 to be protected, in order to ascertain that the criteria set 9 forth in Reynolds are fulfilled."), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 373 10 (2007); Ellsberg, 709 F.2d at 59 n.37 ("When a litigant must lose 11 if the claim is upheld and the government's assertions are 12 dubious in view of the nature of the information requested and 13 the circumstances surrounding the case, careful in camera 14 examination of the material is not only appro…
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Central Intelligence Agency
(2×)
See El-Masri v. United States, 479 F.3d 296, 305 (4th Cir.) (“In some situations, a court may conduct an in camera examination of the actual information sought to be protected, in order to ascertain that the criteria set forth in Reynolds are fulfilled.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 373 , 169 L.Ed.2d 258 (2007); Ellsberg, 709 F.2d at 59 n. 37 (“When a litigant must lose if the claim is upheld and the government’s assertions are dubious in view of the nature of the information requested and the circumstances surrounding the case, careful in camera examination of the material is…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gon v. Gonzales
Compare Ordinola v. Hackman, 478 F.3d 588, 598 (4th Cir.2007) (stating that a district court conducting "habeas review of an extradition case is subject to substantial limitations and is not free 'to rehear what the magistrate has already decided’ ” (quoting Fernandez v. Phillips, 268 U.S. 311, 312 , 45 S.Ct. 541 , 69 L.Ed. 970 (1925)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 373 , 169 L.Ed.2d 259 (2007)), and Hoxha v. Levi, 465 F.3d 554, 560 (3d Cir.2006), with Mancho v. Chertoff, 480 F.Supp.2d 160, 162 (D.D.C.2007) (stating that 8 U.S.C. § 1252 "divestfs] district courts of jurisdiction in ca…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosen
(2×)
See, e.g., El-Masri v. Tenet, 437 F.Supp.2d 530, 537 (E.D.Va.2006) (reviewing the government's basis for an assertion of the “stales secrets privilege” in camera and ex parte), aff'd 479 F.3d 296 (4th Cir.2007), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 373 , 169 L.Ed.2d 258 (2007). 12 .
Khaled EL-MASRI, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
06-1613.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 2007.
Cited by 16 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.