Adair v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Adair v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Speck v. Bates (cafc, 2024-05-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Speck v. Bates (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Cir. · 2024 · confidence medium
In the context of section 135, “the question as to the materiality of limitations is to be 3 Adair, 668 F.3d at 1338 (“The question of material differences between post- and pre-critical date claims for purposes of overcoming a § 135(b) bar ‘is a distinctly differ- ent question from whether claims . . . are directed to the same or substantially the same subject matter’ for pur- poses of provoking an interference.” (quoting Berger, 279 F.3d at 982 )).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Speck v. Bates (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Cir. · 2024 · confidence medium
In the context of section 135, “the question as to the materiality of limitations is to be 3 Adair, 668 F.3d at 1338 (“The question of material differences between post- and pre-critical date claims for purposes of overcoming a § 135(b) bar ‘is a distinctly differ- ent question from whether claims . . . are directed to the same or substantially the same subject matter’ for pur- poses of provoking an interference.” (quoting Berger, 279 F.3d at 982 )).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation
Fed. Cir. · 2015 · confidence medium
Interference No. 105,754, Paper No. 458 at 3 (Dec. 11, 2013) (citing Adair v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1334, 1339 (Fed.Cir.2012)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adair
v.
Carter
2011-1212.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jun 27, 2011.
668 F.3d 1334
Unpublished

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit JOHN ROBERT ADAIR, DILJEET SINGH ATHWAL, AND JOHN SPENCER EMTAGE, Appellants, V. PAUL J. CARTER AND LEONARD G. PRESTA, Cr0ss Appellan.ts. 2011-1212, -1213 ` (Interference No. 105,744) Appeal from the United StateS ‘Patent & Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appea1s and Interferences. ORDER Upon consideration of the cross-appellants unopposed motion for an extension of ti1ne, until Ju]y 27, 2011, to file their opening brief IT ls ORDERED THAT; The motion is granted

norms v. cARTER 2 FoR THE CoURT 2 1 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Doreen Yatko Truji1lo, Esq. _ O1iVer R. Ashe, Jr., Esq. F"-Eo U.S. COURT 0F APPEALS FOR S24 THE FEDERAL ClRCUlT JUN 2 7 2011 .|ANHORB~ALY ` CLEH£