Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 (Cal. 1852). · Go Syfert
Search
Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 (Cal. 1852). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg) (paeb, 1996-11-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg)
Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 1996 · confidence medium
Security Pacific National Bank v. Lyons, 25 Cal.App.4th 706, 711 , 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 623, 626-27 (1994); Prince v. Harting, 177 Cal.App.2d 720, 732 , 177 Cal.App.2d 720 , 2 Cal.Rptr. 545, 552 (1960); Barnstead v. Empire Mining Co., 5 Cal. 299 (1855); Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 (1854); Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 (1853); Russell v. Byron, 2 Cal. 86, 88 (1852); Manok, supra, 31 Cal.App.3d at 211 , 107 Cal.Rptr. at 268 ; Malott v. Seymour, 101 Cal.App.2d 245, 246 , 225 P.2d 310, 311 , (1950) (additional citations omitted); and Hall v. Hagerman, 107 Cal.App.2d 523, 524-25 , 237 P.2d 80, 81 …
GEORGE RUSSELL
v.
BYRON and CHARLES FORD
California Supreme Court.
Jan 15, 1852.
2 Cal. 86
F. W. F. Sloan and J. K. Irving for the appellants., Thomas and Morse, for the respondent.
Heydenfeldt.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
Justice Heydenfeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an action by one partner against his co-partners. The complaint is too defective to sustain the judgment. It asks for judgment for a particular sum, forming a part of partnership profits; and does not pray for an account of the partnership concerns, nor for a dissolution of the partnership. It is impossible that a correct decision can be attained as to the right of one partner, unless all the partnership transactions are brought before the Court and properly investigated and adjusted.

The judgment must be reversed, and the case remanded.

Thursday, February, 19.

The Court overruled a petition for a re-hearing, filed by the appellants.