(a)Every card issuer shall correct any billing error made by the card issuer within two complete billing cycles, but in no event later than 90 days, after receiving an inquiry.
(b)Any card issuer who fails to correct a billing error made by the card issuer within the period prescribed by subdivision (a) shall not be entitled to the amount by which the outstanding balance of the cardholder’s account is greater than the correct balance, nor any interest, finance charges, service charges, or other charges on the obligation giving rise to the billing error.
(c)Any cardholder who is injured by a willful violation of this section may bring an action for the recovery of damages. Judgment may be entered for three times the amount at which actual damages are assessed. The cardholder shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in the action.
Notes of Decisions
Young v. Bank of Am., 141 Cal. App. 3d 108 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 2× “(Civ. Code, §§ 1747.50, 1747.70.) In her complaint for declaratory relief and damages, plaintiff alleged that she notified the Bank that her credit card had been stolen; that the charges thereafter incurred were unauthorized; that despite being so informed the Bank refused to…”
Langan v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 69 F. Supp. 3d 965 (N.D. Cal. 2014).
“Cal. Civ. Code § 1747.50 . The USAA Defendants move to dismiss this claim on the ground that Langan has not identified a billing error in the operative complaint.”
O'Grady v. Merch. Exch. Prods., Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 2019).
“A decade ago, this court considered the scope of a municipal hotel occupancy statute that taxed the services and accommodations accompanying the use and possession of the hotel room.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.