California Codes
Cal. Civil Code § 1747 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This title may be cited as the “Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: Apple Inc. v. Superior Court, 292 P.3d 883 (Cal. 2013).
Apple Inc. v. Superior Court, 292 P.3d 883 (Cal. 2013). “08, prohibits retailers from ―[r]equest[ing], or requir[ing] as a condition to accepting the credit card as payment . . . , the cardholder to write any personal identification information upon the credit card transaction form or otherwise.”
Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., 246 P.3d 612 (Cal. 2011). “The Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Credit Card Act) (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.) is “designed to promote consumer protection.”
Concepcion v. Amscan Holdings, Inc., 223 Cal. App. 4th 1309 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “Acquisition Corporation (collectively Party City) appeal from the trial court’s order awarding $350,000 in attorney fees and costs to class counsel after approving a settlement of coordinated cases alleging Party City had violated the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ.…”
McComber v. Wells, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3925 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999). “122 ] [credit cardholder entitled to emotional distress damages from bank that violated the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.)].) *521 rv Wells correctly asserts section 338, subdivision (f), in pertinent part, requires filing an action against a…”
Folgelstrom v. Lamps Plus, Inc., 195 Cal. App. 4th 986 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011). “FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against Lamps Plus, alleging that the retailer routinely asks its customers for their ZIP codes during credit card transactions so that it can obtain their home addresses for the purpose of mailing marketing…”
Ali v. U.S.A. Cab Ltd., 176 Cal. App. 4th 1333 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “1, a provision of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.), by failing to offer a cash payment discount to all prospective buyers.”
Langan v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 69 F. Supp. 3d 965 (N.D. Cal. 2014). “Cal. Civ. Code § 1747 .02®. Although Langan uses the word “error” in his complaint, he does not identify any specific bill from USAA, much less any error on such a bill.”
Archer v. United Rentals, Inc., 195 Cal. App. 4th 807 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011). “08 of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (SBCCA) (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.). 1 Vincent Archer and Alistair Cochran (collectively plaintiffs) appeal from the judgment entered against defendants on their individual claims for monetary recovery under the SBCCA and the…”
TJX Companies, Inc. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., 163 Cal. App. 4th 80 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “(Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.; all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated.”
Young v. Bank of Am., 141 Cal. App. 3d 108 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983). “Under the Credit Card Act (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.) a credit card issuer is required to correct billing errors within 60 days of notification by the cardholder.”
Golba v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., 238 Cal. App. 4th 1251 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). “The class action complaint alleged violations of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.) (specifically, Civ.”
Party City Corp. v. Superior Court, 169 Cal. App. 4th 497 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “Palmer (plaintiff or real party in interest) under the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971, Civil Code section 1747 et seq. (the Act; all further statutory references are to the Civil Code unless noted).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.