Cal. Education Code § 56300

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A local educational agency shall actively and systematically seek out all individuals with exceptional needs, from birth to 21 years of age, inclusive, including children not enrolled in public school programs, who reside in a school district or are under the jurisdiction of a special education local plan area or a county office of education.

Notes of Decisions
E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified School District Office of Administrative Hearings (2011) ca9 · cites it 2× “111 (a)(1)(ii); Cal. Educ.Code §§ 56300, 56301. In particular, E.”
Everett H. ex rel. Havey v. Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District (2014) caed “That obligation includes both identifying students with disabilities, determining appropriate educational placements and related services through the IEP process, and providing those needed special education and related services.”
Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. San Mateo-Foster City Unified School District (2004) cand “” Cal. Educ.Code § 56300. This obligation includes children in both public and private schools.”
Everett H. ex rel. Havey v. Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District (2014) caed “That obligation includes both identifying students with disabilities, determining appropriate educational placements and related services through the IEP process, and providing those needed special education and related services.”
S.H. v. Mount Diablo Unified School District (2017) cand “” Cal. Educ. Code § 56300 . Similarly, the IDEA “child find” provision requires that *756 “[a]ll children with disabilities residing in the State, including children with disabilities who are homeless children or are wards of the State and children with disabilities attending…”
Cluster 472 · cites it 6× “" Cal. Educ.Code § 56300. "All children with disabilities .”
Hacienda La Puente Unified School District v. Honig (1992) ca9 “” Cal. Educ.Code § 56300; see also id. §§ 56301, 56302.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.