Cal. Government Code § 11139

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The prohibitions and sanctions imposed by this article are in addition to any other prohibitions and sanctions imposed by law.

This article shall not be interpreted in a manner that would frustrate its purpose.

This article shall not be interpreted in a manner that would undermine lawful programs which benefit members of the protected bases described in Section 11135.

This article and regulations adopted pursuant to this article may be enforced by a civil action for equitable relief, which shall be independent of any other rights and remedies.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 13 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Woods v. Horton

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Woods v. Horton (2008) calctapp · cites it 4× “) Government Code Section 11139 Government Code section 11135, subdivision (a) sets forth a nondiscrimination policy for state programs.”

Dennis Sharkey v. Eral O'Neal (2015) ca9 “The principal difference between section 11135 and Title II is that the former statute “may be enforced by a civil action for equitable relief,” Cal. Gov't.Code § 11139, whereas under the latter statute, a plaintiff may recover compensatory damages if he makes a showing of…”

Donovan v. Poway Unified School District (2008) calctapp “” *595 Government Code section 11139 demonstrates that when the Legislature wanted to limit the remedies available in a private enforcement action to equitable or injunctive relief, it clearly knew how to do so.”

Sabi v. Sterling (2010) calctapp “5; Government Code sections 11139, 12921, 12926, 12927, 12930, 12940, 12945, 12948, 12955, 12965, 12970, 12989.”

Prescott v. Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (2017) casd “(“Government Code section 11139 demonstrates that when the Legislature wanted to limit the remedies available in' a private enforcement to equitable or injunctive relief, it clearly knew how to do so.”

Kirola v. City of San Francisco (2014) cand · cites it 2× “The Court rejected the City’s argument, concluding that it could not be logically reconciled with California Government Code § 11139, which expressly provides a private right of action to enforce rights conferred under Section 11135 and its implementing regulations.”

People v. Levinson (1984) calappdeptsuper “4 In view of the administrative regulations implementing this section, and the express language of the section itself, we are constrained to hold that section 11135 does not include such referrals.”

Collins v. Thurmond (2019) calctapp · cites it 2× “” Finally, Government Code section 11139 clarifies that, “The prohibitions and sanctions imposed by this article are in addition to any other prohibitions and sanctions imposed by law.”

Vang v. Board of Trustees of Cal. State University CA5 (2020) calctapp · cites it 2× “” Government Code section 11139 clarifies the remedies available by stating that “[t]he prohibitions and sanctions imposed by this article are in addition to any other prohibitions and sanctions imposed by law.”

Vang v. Board of Trustees of Cal. State University CA5 (2021) calctapp · cites it 2× “” Government Code section 11139 clarifies the remedies available by stating that “[t]he prohibitions and sanctions imposed by this article are in addition to any other prohibitions and sanctions imposed by law.”

Show all 13 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.