Cal. Government Code § 7284.2

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Legislature finds and declares the following:

(a)Immigrants are valuable and essential members of the California community. Almost one in three Californians is foreign born and one in two children in California has at least one immigrant parent.

(b)A relationship of trust between California’s immigrant community and state and local agencies is central to the public safety of the people of California.

(c)This trust is threatened when state and local agencies are entangled with federal immigration enforcement, with the result that immigrant community members fear approaching police when they are victims of, and witnesses to, crimes, seeking basic health services, or attending school, to the detriment of public safety and the well-being of all Californians.

(d)Entangling state and local agencies with federal immigration enforcement programs diverts already limited resources and blurs the lines of accountability between local, state, and federal governments.

(e)State and local participation in federal immigration enforcement programs also raises constitutional concerns, including the prospect that California residents could be detained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, targeted on the basis of race or ethnicity in violation of the Equal Protection Clause, or denied access to education based on immigration status. See Sanchez Ochoa v. Campbell, et al. (E.D. Wash. 2017) 2017 WL 3476777; Trujillo Santoya v. United States, et al. (W.D. Tex. 2017) 2017 WL 2896021; Moreno v. Napolitano (N.D. Ill. 2016) 213 F. Supp. 3d 999; Morales v. Chadbourne (1st Cir. 2015) 793 F.3d 208; Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County (D. Or. 2014) 2014 WL 1414305; Galarza v. Szalczyk (3d Cir. 2014) 745 F.3d 634.

(f)This chapter seeks to ensure effective policing, to protect the safety, well-being, and constitutional rights of the people of California, and to direct the state’s limited resources to matters of greatest concern to state and local governments.

(g)It is the intent of the Legislature that this chapter shall not be construed as providing, expanding, or ratifying any legal authority for any state or local law enforcement agency to participate in immigration enforcement.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2018–2020 · leading case: United States v. California

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. California (2018) caed · cites it 3× “Cal. Gov't Code § 7284.2 (Legislative findings and declarations).”

City & Cnty. of S.F. v. Sessions (2018) cand · cites it 2× “See Cal. Gov. Code § 7284.2 . It amended the TRUST Act by imposing additional constraints on law enforcement's ability to share the release dates of individuals, but it allows law enforcement to notify federal immigration officials about an individual's release date if the…”

City of S.F. v. Sessions (2019) cand “at 938 (citing Cal. Gov. Code § 7284.2 (f) ). It also based policies on local law enforcement's belief in the importance of maintaining trust with immigrant communities.”

City of Huntington Beach v. Becerra (2020) calctapp · cites it 3× “” (Gov. Code, § 7284.2, subds. (a), (b) & (c).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.