Cal. Codes » Penal Code

Cal. Penal Code § 1001.60

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Upon the adoption of a resolution by the board of supervisors declaring that there are sufficient funds available to fund the program, the district attorney may create within his or her office a diversion program pursuant to this chapter for persons who write bad checks. For purposes of this chapter, “writing a bad check” means making, drawing, uttering, or delivering any check or draft upon any bank or depository for the payment of money where there is probable cause to believe there has been a violation of Section 476a. The program may be conducted by the district attorney or by a private entity under contract with the district attorney.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 2006–2019 · leading case: Kevin Breazeale v. Victim Services, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kevin Breazeale v. Victim Services, Inc. (2017) ca9 · cites it 2× “In response, California in 1985 passed Cal. Penal Code § 1001.60 et seq., authorizing a diversion program for bad check writers that could be administered by private entities under contract with the local district attorney.”
Schwarm v. Craighead (2008) caed · cites it 3× “2 CaLPenal Code § 1001.60. DATS, which also did business as Computer Support Services (CSS), contracted with twenty-five California district attorneys’ offices to administer diversion programs pursuant to the BCDA.”
Breazeale v. Victim Services, Inc. (2016) cand · cites it 3× “Cal. Penal Code § 1001.60 et seq. The statutory scheme contemplates that the district attorney will create the county’s diversion program “within his or her office/ Id.”
Del Campo v. Kennedy (2006) cand · cites it 3× “Cal. Pen.Code § 1001.60 et seq. The diversion program is intended to provide a feasible alternative to criminal prosecution by offering bad check writers a chance to pay their debts and clear the incident reports against them without risking criminal prosecution.”
Del Campo v. Kennedy (2008) ca9 “” Cal. Penal Code § 1001.60 . ACCS has built its business around such contracts, based upon the collection of program fees from participants in the diversion program, id.”
Del Campo v. Kennedy (2006) cand “Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 1001.60, ACCS manages the clerical and accounting functions of the program, assists the District Attorney’s Office by recovering restitution and returning it to the victims and conducts the financial accountability classes.”
del Campo v. American Corrective Counseling Services, Inc. (2008) cand “Cal. Pen.Code § 1001.60 et seq. The diversion *589 program is intended to provide a feasible alternative to criminal prosecution by offering bad check writers a chance to pay their debts and clear the incident reports against them without risking criminal prosecution.”
Solberg v. Victim Services, Inc. (2019) cand · cites it 3× “See Cal. Penal Code § 1001.60 et seq. This statute, in addition to setting parameters for the programs generally, allows district attorneys to contract with private entities to handle referrals from victims, collect fees, and teach the classes.”
Del Campo v. American Corrective Counseling (2008) ca9 “” CAL. PENAL CODE § 1001.60. ACCS has built its business around such contracts, based upon the collection of program fees from participants in the diversion program, id.”
— Cal. Penal Code § 1001.60(a) — 1 case
Schwarm v. Craighead (2008) caed “2 CaLPenal Code § 1001.60. DATS, which also did business as Computer Support Services (CSS), contracted with twenty-five California district attorneys’ offices to administer diversion programs pursuant to the BCDA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.