In determining whether good cause has been established for not entering into a franchise or relocating an existing dealership of the same line-make, the board shall take into consideration the existing circumstances, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(a)Permanency of the investment.
(b)Effect on the retail motor vehicle business and the consuming public in the relevant market area.
(c)Whether it is injurious to the public welfare for an additional franchise to be established or an existing dealership to be relocated.
(d)Whether the franchisees of the same line-make in the relevant market area are providing adequate competition and convenient consumer care for the motor vehicles of the line-make in the market area, which shall include the adequacy of motor vehicle sales and service facilities, equipment, supply of vehicle parts, and qualified service personnel.
(e)Whether the establishment of an additional franchise would increase competition and therefore be in the public interest.
(f)For purposes of this section, the terms “motor vehicle dealership” and “dealership” shall have the same meaning as defined in Section 3062.
Notes of Decisions
Gen. Motors Corp. v. Motor Veh. Review Bd., 836 N.E.2d 903 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005).
· cites it 2× “41, 44-46 (1980), a California appellate court rejected an argument that the good-cause standard contained in the California Automobile Franchise Act (California Act) (Cal. Veh.Code § 3063 (West 1980)), which contained only five circumstances to consider, was unconstitutionally…”
Ri-Joyce, Inc. v. New Motor Veh. Bd., 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 321 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992).
“” Vehicle Code section 3063 provides: “In determining whether good cause has been established for not entering into or relocating an additional franchise for the same line-make, the board shall take into consideration the existing circumstances, including, but not limited to,…”
Piano v. State ex rel. New Motor Veh. Bd., 103 Cal. App. 3d 412 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980).
“” Vehicle Code section 3063 provides: “In determining whether good cause has been established for not entering into or relocating an additional franchise for the same line-make, the board shall take into consideration the existing circumstances, including, but not limited to:…”
Piano v. St., Calif. Ex Rel. New Motor Veh. Bd, 103 Cal. App. 3d 412 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980).
“" [3] Vehicle Code section 3063 provides: "In determining whether good cause has been established for not entering into or relocating an additional franchise for the same line-make, the board shall take into consideration the existing circumstances, including, but not limited…”
Gen. Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Veh. Review Bd. (Ill. App. Ct. 2005).
“41, 44-46 (1980), a California appellate court rejected an argument that the good-cause standard contained in the California Automobile Franchise Act (California Act) ( Cal. Veh. Code §3063 (West 1980)), which contained only five circumstances to consider, was unconstitutionally…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.