green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Timoteo
(2×)
See, e.g., Chaifetz v. United States, 288 F.2d 133, 136 (D.C.Cir.1960) (“Since [the defendant] could not, at the time of his trial, have been convicted of the [time-barred lesser included offense], he was not entitled to have the trial judge tell the jury it could, or should, find him guilty of that offense.”), reversed in part on other grounds, 366 U.S. 209 , 81 S.Ct. 1051 , 6 L.Ed.2d 233 (1961); Johnson v. State, 265 Ind. 470 , 355 N.E.2d 240, 242 (1976) (“[I]f the defendant could not be convicted of the [time-barred] lesser included offense, the instructions upon such offense are prop…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chaifetz
v.
United States
v.
United States
695.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1961.
Abraham, Chaijetz and I. William, Stempil for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Meyer Rothwacks for the United States.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 26 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
Upon consideration of the entire record and the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to that part of the judgment concerned with Count IY of the indictment and that part of the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the conviction on that Count. In all other respects the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.