v.
Jeffrey Howard et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION ______
FRANK HARRIS, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-15 v. Honorable Hala Y. Jarbou
JEFFREY HOWARD et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER LIFTING STAY AND FOR SERVICE This is a prisoner civil rights action. The Court previously reviewed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c), to determine whether it was frivolous, malicious, failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted or sought monetary relief against a defendant that was immune from such relief. As a result of that review, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Storey, Batho, Teneyck, Desormeau, Dotson, Mills, Shunk, Slater, and Voorhees were dismissed. (ECF Nos. 7 & 8.) The Court also dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation, Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process, substantive due process, and equal protection, and conspiracy claims against Defendant Howard. (Id.) The Court then referred the remaining ADA, RA, and state law claims against Defendant Howard to the Pro Se Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation Early Mediation Program and entered an order staying the case for any purpose other than mediation. (ECF No. 9.) The case was not resolved through the early mediation program. (ECF No. 20.) Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the stay of this proceeding that was entered to facilitate the mediation is LIFTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis in its May 30, 2025, order (ECF No. 8), Plaintiff is responsible for paying the entire $350.00 filing fee in installments, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). See McGore v.
Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled in other part by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); Hampton v. Hobbs, 106 F.3d 1281 (6th Cir. 1997). Plaintiff must pay the filing fee through monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s prison trust fund account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Accordingly, each month that the amount in Plaintiff’s trust account exceeds $10.00, the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall collect 20 percent of the preceding months’ income and remit that amount to the Clerk of this Court. The agency shall continue to collect monthly payments from Plaintiff’s prisoner account until the entire filing fee is paid. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 90-day period for service set forth in Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 4(m) shall run, starting with the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall forward the complaint to the U.S. Marshals Service, which is authorized to mail a request for waiver of service to Defendant Howard in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). If waiver of service is unsuccessful, summons shall issue and be forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Howard shall file an appearance of counsel (individual Defendants may appear pro se if they do not have counsel) within 21 days of service or, in the case of a waiver of service, 60 days after the waiver of service was sent. Until so ordered by the Court, Defendant Howard is not required to file an answer or motion in response to the complaint, and no default will be entered for failure to do so. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(1). After Defendant Howard has filed an appearance, the Court will enter a case management order to govern further proceedings in this case.
Dated: October 8, 2025 /s/ Ray Kent Ray Kent United States Magistrate Judge