Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC., 499 F.3d 923 (9th Cir. 2007).
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC., 499 F.3d 923 (9th Cir. 2007). Book View Copy Cite
Negative Treatment Vacated 1 negative
Sarei
v.
Rio Tinto, PLC.
02-56256, 02-56390.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 20, 2007.
499 F.3d 923
Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Steve W. Berman, Esq., Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, LLP, Paul N. Luvera, Jr., Luvera Law Firm, Seattle, WA, Paul Stocker, Esq., Mill Creek, WA, R. Brent Walton, Esq., Cuneo Gilbert & Laduca LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jack W. Londen, Esq., James J. Brosnahan, Esq., Morrison & Foerster, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Charles E. Patterson, Esq., Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Craig E. Stewart, Esq., for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Prior report: 9th Cir., 487 F.3d 1193

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,[*] it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

[*] Judges Hawkins and Wardlaw are recused.