Mayflower Indus. v. Thor Corp., 89 A.2d 242 (N.J. 1952).
Mayflower Indus. v. Thor Corp., 89 A.2d 242 (N.J. 1952). Book View Copy Cite
Positive Treatment Affirmed 1 positive
Mayflower Industries, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thor Corporation, an Illinois Corporation, and Teldisco, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Defendants-Respondents
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 16, 1952.
89 A.2d 242
Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman and Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, attorneys)., Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent Thor Corporation., Mr. Sol D. Kapelsohn argued the cause for the respondent Teldisco, Inc. (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).
Per Curiam.
Cited by 74 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Erancis in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenpeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan —6.

For reversal — None.