Ex Parte Roberts, 31 U.S. 216 (1832).
Ex Parte Roberts, 31 U.S. 216 (1832). Book View Copy Cite
Ex Parte Joseph Roberts, and Ex Parte George Adshead
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1832.
31 U.S. 216
The motion for a mandamus was argued in writing by Mr Beardsley, as counsel for the claimants.
Marshall.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
Mr Chief Justice Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The court is of opinión that the present is not a proper case for the interposition of this court, by way of mandamus. The application to set aside the default and inquest, was an.application to the discretion of the district court; and is not distinguishable in principle from- applications to grant new trials. This court has always considered such applications as r'ésting In the sound discretion of the court where the cause is depending, and not a matter for a mandamus or writ of err'or.