SIERRA CLUB; Wilderness Society; Texas Committee on Natural Resources, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
R. Max PETERSON, Et Al., Defendants, Daniel Glickman, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture; Gloria Manning, in Her Official Capacity as the Acting Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service, Region 8; Michael Dombeck, in His Official Capacity as Chief, U.S. Forest Service; Ronald Raum, in His Official Capacity as the Forest Supervisor, National Forests and Grasslands in Texas, Defendants-Appellants, Texas Forestry Association; Southern Timber Purchasers Council, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants
v.
R. Max PETERSON, Et Al., Defendants, Daniel Glickman, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture; Gloria Manning, in Her Official Capacity as the Acting Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service, Region 8; Michael Dombeck, in His Official Capacity as Chief, U.S. Forest Service; Ronald Raum, in His Official Capacity as the Forest Supervisor, National Forests and Grasslands in Texas, Defendants-Appellants, Texas Forestry Association; Southern Timber Purchasers Council, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants
97-41274.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 16, 2000.
204 F.3d 580
Mary Alice Van Kerrebrook (argued), Wilson, Cribbs, Goren & Flaum, Houston, TX, for Sierra Club., Ingrid Karin Hansen, Ashley Kingsland Wadiek (argued), Austin, TX, for Wilderness Society., Edward C. Fritz, Dallas, TX, for Texas Committee On Natural Resources., David C. Shilton, Elizabeth Ann Peterson, Lisa Holden (General Litigation Section), U.S. Dept, of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Div., Washington, DC, Ruth Harris Yeager, Tyler, TX, Wells D. Burgess, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Land & Natural Resources Div., Stephanie Marie Parent, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, Robert L. Klarquist (argued), U.S. Dept, of Justice, Environment & Natural Resource Div., Arlington, VA, for Glick-man, Manning, Dombeck and Raum.
King, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza, Demoss, Benavides, Stewart, Dennis.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.