Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chem. Corp., 71 A.2d 629 (N.J. 1950).
Search
Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chem. Corp., 71 A.2d 629 (N.J. 1950). Book View Copy Cite
Max Weissbard, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Potter Drug & Chemical Corporation, Defendant-Respondent
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 6, 1950.
71 A.2d 629
Mr. Sandford Freedman argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder i£ Kaufman, attorneys)., Mr. Joseph H. Stamler argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Lorentz ■& Stamler, attorneys).
Per Curiam.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ereund in the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

For affirmance—-Chief Justice Yanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld and Burling—-5.

For reversal—None.