Toft v. Ketchum, 114 A.2d 863 (N.J. 1955).
Search
Toft v. Ketchum, 114 A.2d 863 (N.J. 1955). Book View Copy Cite
Howard Lionel Toft, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mary G. Ketchum, Defendant-Respondent
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 20, 1955.
114 A.2d 863
Mr. Martin Kimmel argued the cause for the appellant., Mr. Oliver R. Kovacs argued the cause for the respondent., Mr. Harry Green, Mr. Lionel P. Kristeller, Miss Emma E. Dillon, and Mr. Franklin H. Berry filed a brief on behalf of the New Jersey State Bar Association, amicus curiae.
Vanderbilt, Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs, Brennan, Wacheneeld, Burling.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Vanderbilt heretofore filed. Mr. Justice Jacobs votes to affirm for the reasons expressed in his concurring opinion previously filed. Mr. Justice Waehenfeld and Mr. Justice Burling vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in their respective dissenting opinions previously filed. See 18 N. J. 280 (1955).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs and Brennan — 5. For reversal — Justices Wacheneeld and Burling — 2.