Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New York, 465 N.E.2d 1251 (NY 1984).
Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New York, 465 N.E.2d 1251 (NY 1984). Book View Copy Cite
Greystone Management Corp. Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Conciliation and Appeals Board of the City of New York, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
May 1, 1984.
465 N.E.2d 1251
Gary M. Rosenberg, Sherwin Belkin and Robert A. Jacobs for appellants., Ellis S. Franke for respondent.
Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye Concur.
Cited by 46 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in refusing to grant declaratory relief in this case (Bower & Gardner v Evans, 60 NY2d 781). Generally, a declaratory judgment action is not the proper vehicle to challenge an administrative procedure, where judicial review by way of article 78 proceeding is available.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.