Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Southwire Co., 313 F.2d 638 (5th Cir. 1963).
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Southwire Co., 313 F.2d 638 (5th Cir. 1963). Book View Copy Cite
✓ Positive Treatment Affirmed 1 positive ▼
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, Respondent
20008_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 6, 1963.
313 F.2d 638
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., for petitioner., Frank M. Swift, Atlanta, Ga., Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., Holderness & Word, Carroll-ton, Ga., for respondent.
Jones, Bell, Grooms.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding for the enforcement against the respondent of an order of the petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, the only question before us is whether there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board’s findings. No purpose would be served by a recital of the evidence or of the fact issues which were resolved by the Board. There is substantial evidence to support the findings. The Board’s order will be

Enforced.