Raymond RODRIGUEZ-DE LEON, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
18773.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 14, 1963.
David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner., Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief of Civil Section, and Jacqueline L. Weiss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Browning, Duniway, Mathes.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of deportation. He did not, however, exhaust his administrative remedies by appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Under these circumstances, his petition must be dismissed. Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 139; Murillo-Aguilera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 141. Section 10(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 1009(c)) is of no help to petitioner. It applies “except as otherwise expressly required by statute.” Here the statute, section 106(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, (8 U.S.C. § 1105a(c)) does otherwise expressly require.
Dismissed.