Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., & Technograph Printed Elec., Inc. v. Bendix Corp., 327 F.2d 497 (4th Cir. 1964).
Search
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., & Technograph Printed Elec., Inc. v. Bendix Corp., 327 F.2d 497 (4th Cir. 1964). Book View Copy Cite
TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Appellants,
v.
BENDIX CORPORATION, Appellee
9085_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 17, 1964.
327 F.2d 497
Walter J. Blenko, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John W. Avirett, II, Baltimore, Md., Walter J. Blenko, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., M. Victor Leventritt, New York City, Piper & Marbury, Baltimore, Md., and Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Buell, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief), for appellants., Harold J. Birch and Edward S. Irons, Washington, D. C. (Benjamin C. Howard, Baltimore, Md., William W. Beckett, Hy-attsville, Md., Edward F. McKie, Jr., Washington, D. C., Miles & Stoekbridge, Baltimore, Md., and Irons, Birch, Swindler & McKie, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.
Haynsworth, Boreman, Bryan.
Cited by 38 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the record, the arguments and the briefs of counsel, we are persuaded that the patent claims are invalid for obviousness in the light of the prior art for the reasons fully discussed in the opinion of the District Court. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp., D.C. Md., 218 F.Supp. 1.

Affirmed.