Otto Candies, Inc. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 332 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1964).
Search
Otto Candies, Inc. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 332 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1964). Book View Copy Cite
OTTO CANDIES, INC., Appellant,
v.
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
21104_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 2, 1964.
332 F.2d 372
George B. Matthews, Lemle & Kelleher, New Orleans, La., for Otto Candies, Inc., appellant., J. Barbee Winston, New Orleans, La., Jas. Hy. Bruns, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for appellee.
Bootle, Jones, Per Curiam, Rives.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The appellant’s opening paragraph in its brief recites that it has little, if any, quarrel with the findings of fact of the district court, although the inferences and conclusions are challenged. The findings of fact and conclusions are in [*373] the district court’s published opinion. Otto Candies, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, D.C.La., 221 F.Supp. 1014. The case is one where, under McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20, we must affirm the district court. Were we free to consider the case de novo we would reach no different conclusion.

The judgment of the district court is Affirmed.