Jimmie W. Sullivan v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appellee, 338 F.2d 1004 (10th Cir. 1964).
Jimmie W. Sullivan v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appellee, 338 F.2d 1004 (10th Cir. 1964). Book View Copy Cite
Jimmie W. SULLIVAN, Appellant,
v.
J. C. TAYLOR, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee
7800_1.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Dec 8, 1964.
338 F.2d 1004
Jack R. Lawrence, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant., Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Murrah, Per Curiam, Pickett, Seth.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

In this habeas corpus proceedings, the petitioner attacks his judgment of sentence contending that a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” The same issues presented here were before the trial Court in a former 2255 proceedings, affirmed in this Court in Sullivan v. United States, 10 Cir., 315 F.2d 304. The remedy under Sec. 2255 is not inadequate or ineffective even though unsuccessful.

Affirmed.