Constr. Prods. Corp. & C.P.C. Chem. & Plastics Corp., a Florida Corp. v. Di-Noc Chem. Arts, Inc., 343 F.2d 166 (4th Cir. 1965).
Constr. Prods. Corp. & C.P.C. Chem. & Plastics Corp., a Florida Corp. v. Di-Noc Chem. Arts, Inc., 343 F.2d 166 (4th Cir. 1965). Book View Copy Cite
CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION and C. P. C. Chemical & Plastics Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellees,
v.
DI-NOC CHEMICAL ARTS, INC., Appellant
9774.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Mar 11, 1965.
343 F.2d 166
H. Stephen Madsen, Cleveland, Ohio (Joseph T. Gorman, Kent, Ohio, A. Baron Holmes III, Charleston, S. C., Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, and Hagood, Rivers & Young, Charleston, S. C., on brief), for appellant., Don G. Nicholson, Miami, Fla., and Ernest F. Hollings, Charleston, S. C. (Hollings & Hawkins, Charleston, S. C., and Nicholson, Howard & Brawner, Miami, Fla., on brief), for appellees.
Bryan, Bell, Hutche-Son.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal 1 from an order of the district court denying a foreign corporate defendant’s motions to dismiss the action for lack of in personam jurisdiction and for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer the case under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a) to the-Northern District of Ohio.

The court’s order was based upon the complaint, exhibits attached thereto, and affidavits. We agree that at this stage of the case, the motions were properly denied. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b).