Cooper Agency, Inc. v. Harold M. McLeod Dist. Dir. of Internal Revenue & United States of Am., 348 F.2d 919 (4th Cir. 1965).
Cooper Agency, Inc. v. Harold M. McLeod Dist. Dir. of Internal Revenue & United States of Am., 348 F.2d 919 (4th Cir. 1965). Book View Copy Cite
COOPER AGENCY, INC., Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Harold M. McLEOD, District Director of Internal Revenue and United States of America, Appellees
9871.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 4, 1965.
348 F.2d 919
Robert J. Thomas and N. Welch Mor-risette, Jr., Columbia, S. C. (Gedney M. Howe, Jr., Arthur G. Howe, Charleston, S. C., Tompkins, McMaster & Thomas, and Cooper, Gary, Nexsen & Pruet, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants., George F. Lynch, Attorney, Department of Justice (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Meyer Rothwacks, Attorneys, Department of Justice, and Terrell L. Glenn, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellees.
Haynsworth, Boreman, Bryan.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs seek to test their tax liabilities in an action for an injunction and for removal of the cloud cast upon their properties by the tax liens. The judgment of the District Court dismissing these complaints is affirmed for the reasons stated by the District Judge 1

We recently considered similar contentions and held them unavailing. 2 At about the same time the Second and Third Circuits arrived at the same conclusion. 3

Affirmed.

2

. Broadwell v. United States, 4 Cir., 343 F.2d 470.

3

. Falik v. United States, 2 Cir., 343 F.2d 38; Quinn v. Hook, 3 Cir., 341 F.2d 920.