United States v. Othell Campbell, 395 F.2d 848 (4th Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Othell Campbell, 395 F.2d 848 (4th Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Wert, 550 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1977)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 848 Applying open field doctrine to warrantless observations3 citing casesPER CURIAM: Convicted of possession of illicit whiskey, Othell Campbell has appealed, complaining that his motion to suppress evidence gained from an unlawful…opening of page *848 (no citing court says what it cites this page for)
  • State v. Wert, 550 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1977).published 2 cites
    E.g., United States v. Campbell, 395 F.2d 848, 848-849 (4th Cir. 1968); McDowell v. United States, 383 F.2d 599, 603 (8th Cir. 1967); United States v. Hassell, 336 F.2d 684 (6th Cir. 1964); United States v. Romano, 330 F.2d 566, 569 (2d Ci…
  • United States v. Watt, 309 F. Supp. 329 (N.D. Cal. 1970).published
    E. g., United States v. Campbell, 395 F.2d 848, 848-849 (4th Cir. 1968); McDowell v. United States, 383 F.2d 599, 603 (8th Cir. 1967); United States v. Hassell, 336 F.2d 684 (6th Cir. 1964); United States v. Romano, 330 F.2d 566, 569 (2d C…
  • Mendes v. Wendling, No. 5:19-cv-00072 (W.D. Va. July 21, 2022).
    See United States v. Campbell, 395 F.2d 848, 848 (4th Cir. 1968); Shafer v. United States, 229 F.2d 124, 128-129 (4th Cir. 1956); Janney v. United States, 206 F.2d 601, 602 (4th Cir. 1953).
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Othell CAMPBELL, Appellant
11584.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 20, 1968.
Published opinion
395 F.2d 848
1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6862
Thomas W. Greene, Greenville, S. C. (Sol E. Abrams, and Abrams, Bowen & Townes, Greenville, S. C., on brief) for appellant., William B. Long, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (Klyde Robinson, U. S. Atty., and Robert O. DuPre, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief) for appellee.
Haynsworth, Craven, Mac-Kenzie.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Convicted of possession of illicit whiskey, Othell Campbell has appealed, complaining that his motion to suppress evidence gained from an unlawful search and seizure should have been granted. The search in question was the viewing by Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division agents from an adjacent cornfield of a transaction in illicit whiskey which took place in the backyard of Campbell’s home. The agents were not within the curtilage and the “open field” doctrine is applicable to their observations. Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57, 44 S.Ct. 445, 68 L.Ed. 898; United States v. Shue, 4 Cir., 385 F.2d 416; McDowell v. United States, 8 Cir., 383 F.2d 599; Rosencranz v. United States, 1 Cir., 356 F.2d 310; United States v. Hassell, 6 Cir., 336 F.2d 684; United States v. Young, 4 Cir., 322 F.2d 443; United States v. Potts, 6 Cir., 297 F.2d 68;[*849] Hodges v. United States, 5 Cir., 243 F.2d 281; Care v. United States, 10 Cir., 231 F.2d 22; Janney v. United States, 4 Cir., 206 F.2d 601. Nothing said in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576, requires a different result.

Affirmed.