Tyrone Woods v. United States, 397 F.2d 156 (9th Cir. 1968).
Search
Tyrone Woods v. United States, 397 F.2d 156 (9th Cir. 1968). Book View Copy Cite
Tyrone WOODS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
21757.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 18, 1968.
397 F.2d 156
Luke McKissack, Hollywood, Cal., for appellant., William M. Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Division, Michael D. Nasatir, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Chambers, Ely, Per Curiam, Thompson.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Woods was convicted on one count for bank robbery, and he appeals.

He claims the teachings of Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), were not followed when he was apprehended. Taken all together, we find the record does not support Woods but supports the government.

Also, he complains of the absence of counsel when a fingerprint exemplar was taken from him. Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967), (handwriting exemplars), clearly should apply here.

Judgment affirmed.