JENKINS METAL SHOPS, INC., Appellees,
v.
PNEUMAFIL CORPORATION, Appellant
v.
PNEUMAFIL CORPORATION, Appellant
13886.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 8, 1970.
Robert W. Fiddler, New York City (J. Carlton Fleming, Charlotte, N. C., on brief) for appellant., Clifton T. Hunt, Jr., Greensboro, N. C. (Hunt, Heard & Rhodes, Greensboro, N. C., on brief) for appellees.
Sobeloff, Boreman, Butzner.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant’s patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge’s findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 303 F.Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C.1969), its judgment is
Affirmed.