Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corp., 427 F.2d 144 (4th Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corp., 427 F.2d 144 (4th Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant (cafc, 1983-11-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant
Fed. Cir. · 1983 · confidence medium
The trial court pointed to the legal impropriety of treating the structural claims in suit one way when considering validity and another when considering infringement, citing Sterner Lighting, Inc. v. Allied Electrical Supply, Inc., 431 F.2d 539, 544 , 166 USPQ 454, 459 (5th Cir.1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JENKINS METAL SHOPS, INC., Appellees,
v.
PNEUMAFIL CORPORATION, Appellant
13886.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 8, 1970.
427 F.2d 144
1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8816
Robert W. Fiddler, New York City (J. Carlton Fleming, Charlotte, N. C., on brief) for appellant., Clifton T. Hunt, Jr., Greensboro, N. C. (Hunt, Heard & Rhodes, Greensboro, N. C., on brief) for appellees.
Sobeloff, Boreman, Butzner.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant’s patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge’s findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 303 F.Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C.1969), its judgment is

Affirmed.