United States of Am., & v. Joseph Anthony Davis, 447 F.2d 1376 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
United States of Am., & v. Joseph Anthony Davis, 447 F.2d 1376 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Joseph Anthony DAVIS, Appellant
26415.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 13, 1971.
447 F.2d 1376
Daniel Kannlen (argued), Somers & Kallen, Santa Monica, Cal., for appellant., Elgin Edwards, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Chambers, Kilkenny, Per Curiam, Powell.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

Davis contends that the implication of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295, 90 S.Ct. 506, 24 L.Ed.2d 532, and other cases require a finding here that induction was accelerated because of his delinquency. On the record, we think not.

United States v. Davis (9th Cir. 1970), 432 F.2d 1009; Misenhimer v. United States (9th Cir. July 22, 1971) 71-1384; and United States v. Pennington (9th Cir. 1971), 439 F.2d 145, require affirmance. We find United States v. Dobie, 444 F.2d 417 (4th Cir., 1971) distinguishable.

The mandate will issue now.