At page 339 Courts defer to prison administration regarding inmate classification25 citing cases“classification of inmates is a matter of prison administration and management with which federal courts are reluctant to interfere except in extreme circumstances.”
- Weaver, No. 5:23-cv-00061 (S.D. Ga. June 30, 2026).(Classification of inmates is a matter of prison administration and management with which federal courts are reluctant to interfere except in extreme circumstances.)
- Errol Ray Lynch v. Orleans Par. Sheriff’s Off. Med. Dep't, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Doctor A. Blake, Doctor A. Walker, Nurse P. Spencer, & Captain J. Banks, No. 2:25-cv-01842 (E.D. La. Sept. 30, 2025).(classification of inmates is a matter of prison administration and management withJo wnehsi cvh. fUendieteradl Sctoautersts are reluctant to interfere exceptc eirnt . edxetnreiemde circumstances)
- Godhigh v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., No. 3:22-cv-00618 (M.D. Fla. June 8, 2022).(Classification of inmates is a matter of prison administration and 2 management with which federal courts are reluctant to interfere except in extreme circumstances.)
- Spears, No. 2:26-cv-01031 (E.D. La. Aug. 11, 2026).Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 547-48 (1979); Smith v. Bingham, 914 F.2d 740, 742 (5th Cir. 1990); Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1971).
- Saud, No. 2:25-cv-00393 (W.D. La. Mar. 16, 2026).(affirming denial of injunction to obtain release from administrative segregation)
- Newman, No. 2:25-cv-02478 (E.D. La. Feb. 9, 2026).(affirming denial of injunction to obtain release from administrative segregation)
- Emmers v. Mitchener, No. 2:25-cv-00177 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2025).Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1971); see also Humphrey v. Layton, 58 F.3d 636 , 1995 WL 371021 , at *1 n.5 (5th Cir. 1995).
- Moorehart v. Laporte, No. 6:24-cv-01518 (W.D. La. Aug. 13, 2025).(affirming denial of injunction to obtain release from administrative segregation)
- Morris v. Howard, No. 3:24-cv-03148 (N.D. Tex. June 18, 2025).Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1971); see also Humphrey v. Layton, 58 F.3d 636 , 1995 WL 371021 , at *1 n.5 (5th Cir. 1995).
- Roberts v. Day, No. 2:25-cv-00360 (E.D. La. June 5, 2025).(affirming denial of injunction to obtain release from administrative segregation)
Show 14 more citing cases
- Thomisee v. Calcasieu Par., No. 2:24-cv-00061 (W.D. La. Sept. 12, 2024).(affirming denial of injunction to obtain release from administrative segregation)
- Thomisee v. Lake Charles, No. 2:24-cv-00062 (W.D. La. Sept. 12, 2024).(affirming denial of injunction to obtain release from administrative segregation)
- Parker v. Chet Morrison Contractors LLC, No. 2:23-cv-05122 (E.D. La. Aug. 28, 2024).“Classification of inmates is a matter of prison administration and management with which federal courts are reluctant to interfere except in extreme circumstances.” Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1971) (per curiam) (cita…
- Strausbaugh v. Terrebonne Par. Crim. Just. Complex Sheriff's Off., No. 2:24-cv-01213 (E.D. La. Aug. 13, 2024). (affirming denial of injunction to obtain release from administrative segregation)
- Shafer v. Sanchez, No. 2:22-cv-00049 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2023).“Classification of inmates is a matter of prison 13 / 19 administration and management with which federal courts are reluctant to interfere except in extreme circumstances.” Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1971) (per curia…
- Grillett v. Dir., TDCJ-CID, No. 9:22-cv-00118 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 18, 2023).Hernandez, 522 F.3d at 562 ; Jackson v. Cain, 864 F.2d 1235, 1247-48 (5th Cir. 1989); Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1971).
- Anthony v. Thomas, No. 2:21-cv-01251 (W.D. La. Jan. 19, 2022).(affirming denial of injunction to obtain release from administrative segregation)
- Muhammad v. Wiles, No. 3:19-cv-00367 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2020).Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1971).
- Jimenez v. Dir. TDCJ-CID, No. 2:17-cv-00139 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2020).(affirming denial of injunctive relief to obtain release from administrative segregation)
- Juan Enriquez v. Oliver Bell, in His Off. Capacity as Chairman of the Texas Bd. of Crim. Just., No. 04-13-00077-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 11, 2013).publishedYoung v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1971).
- Isiah Carl Green v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Dir., Texas Dep't of Corr., 788 F.2d 1116 (5th Cir. 1986).published(classification of inmates is a matter of prison administration and management with which federal courts are reluctant to inter *1125 fere except in extreme circumstances)
- Carver v. Wharton, 532 F. Supp. 512 (S.D. Ga. 1982).publishedDenial of Reduction in Security Status “Classification of inmates is a matter of prison administration and management with which federal courts are reluctant to interfere except in extreme circumstances.” Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338,…
- McGruder v. Phelps, 608 F.2d 1023 (5th Cir. 1979).published Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 242 , 96 S.Ct. 2543 , 49 L.Ed.2d 466 (1976); Jones v. U. S., 534 F.2d 53, 54 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 978 , 97 S.Ct. 487 , 50 L.Ed.2d 586 (1976); Young v. Wainwright, 449 F.2d 338, 339 (5th Cir.…
- Timothy Dean Stone, TDCJ 1177762 v. Warden Furr, No. 13-19-00468-CV (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Mar. 25, 2021).publishedThe Pichardo court explained that [t]he Supreme Court . . . held that a prisoner’s liberty interest is “generally limited to freedom from restraint which, while not exceeding the sentence in such an unexpected manner as to give rise to pro…
Other citing cases
- Brenneman v. Madigan, 343 F. Supp. 128 (N.D. Cal. 1972).published
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent-Appellee
Appellant is a Florida state prisoner serving a life sentence for murder.
He filed a petition in the court below under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking an injunction to obtain his permanent release from administrative segregation. He alleged that such confinement is unlawful because he has violated no prison regulations. The district court dismissed the petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We affirm. [1]
Classification of inmates is a matter of prison administration and management with which federal courts are reluctant to interfere except in extreme circumstances^. See Krist v. Smith, 5th Cir. 1971, 439 F.2d 146; Flint v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1970, 433 F.2d 961; Granville v. Hunt, 5th Cir. 1969, 411 F.2d 9. There being no extreme circumstances present in this case, the judgment below is affirmed.
Affirmed.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.