United States of Am., & v. Joel Mark De Smet, 456 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1972).

United States of Am., & v. Joel Mark De Smet, 456 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1972). Book View Copy Cite

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Joel Mark DE SMET, Appellant

71-2811.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Apr 11, 1972.

456 F.2d 1311

1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10168

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Joel Shawn (argued), of Lukes & Bassoni, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, & Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Chambers, Hamlin, Jameson, Per Curiam.

Cited by 1 opinion | Published

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the “call” process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.

However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in the “calling.”