Laszlo Habda v. Jack Wysocker, Esq, 458 F.2d 537 (3rd Cir. 1972).
Search
Laszlo Habda v. Jack Wysocker, Esq, 458 F.2d 537 (3rd Cir. 1972). Book View Copy Cite
Laszlo HABDA, Appellant,
v.
Jack WYSOCKER, Esq.
71-1428.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 1, 1972.
458 F.2d 537
Laszlo Habda, in pro. per., Ralph De Sevo, De Sevo, Cerutti, Lom-badi & Fitzpatrick, Jersey City, N. J., for appellee.
Hastie, Gibbons, Becker.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s civil action for damages against his former attorney alleges that the attorney in a criminal case in a state court neglected to challenge the legal sufficiency of an indictment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that there was no federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1343. On the authority of Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 9, 1972), we affirm.