Paul Stefanyshyn v. Shafer Contracting, 190 F. App'x 521 (8th Cir. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Paul Stefanyshyn v. Shafer Contracting, 190 F. App'x 521 (8th Cir. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul STEFANYSHYN, Appellant,
v.
SHAFER CONTRACTING CO., INC., Appellee
05-3197.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Aug 9, 2006.
190 F. App'x 521
Paul Stefanyshyn, St. Paul, MN, Pro se., Timothy J. Ewald, Dominic Joseph Cecere, Leonard & Street, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.
Murphy, Bye, Melloy.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM.

Paul Stefanyshyn appeals the district court’s [1] dismissal of his complaint under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Missouri Human Rights Act. Following de novo review, see Meyer v. City of Joplin, 281 F.3d 759, 760 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that Stefanyshyn failed to state a claim under either statute, see 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)-(c) (defining types of prohibited age discrimination); Minn.Stat. § 363A.08(2) (2004) (defining types of prohibited discrimination).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now retired.