Alice M. Thompson v. Mel Tonasket, as Members of the Colville Bus. Council of the Colville Confederated Tribe, & the Colville Confederated Tribe, 487 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Alice M. Thompson v. Mel Tonasket, as Members of the Colville Bus. Council of the Colville Confederated Tribe, & the Colville Confederated Tribe, 487 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Aubertin v. Colville Confederated Tribes (waed, 1978-01-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Aubertin v. Colville Confederated Tribes
E.D. Wash. · 1978 · signal: accord · confidence high
Howlett v. Salish and Kootenai Tribes, 529 F.2d 233 (9th Cir. 1976); Johnson v. Lower Elwha Tribal Community, 484 F.2d 200 (9th Cir. 1973); accord, Thompson v. Tonasket, 487 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1973); Laramie v. Nicholson, 487 F.2d 315 (9th Cir. 1973); Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. United States, 515 F.2d 926 , 934 n. 9 (10th Cir. 1975); Martinez v. Santa Clara Pueblo, 540 F.2d 1039 (10th Cir. 1976). 8 . 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (4).
cited Cited "see" Kevin Howlett v. The Salish and Kootenal Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana
9th Cir. · 1976 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Thompson v. Tonasket, 487 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1973); Laramie v. Nicholson, 487 F.2d 315 (9th Cir. 1973); see generally Settler v. Lameer, 419 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alice M. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mel TONASKET Et Al., as Members of the Colville Business Council of the Colville Confederated Tribe, and the Colville Confederated Tribe, Defendants-Appellees
72-1193.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 2, 1973.
487 F.2d 316
1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7255
Kelly Hancock, Omak, Wash., for plaintiff-appellant., Robert L. Pirtle, Ziontz, Pirtle & Mor-isset, Seattle, Wash., for defendants-ap-pellees.
Koelsch, Duniway, Wallace.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

This case presents the same jurisdictional question as was presented in the case of Laramie v. Nicholson, 9 Cir., 1973, 487 F.2d 315. As in that case, the trial judge held that he had no jurisdiction and dismissed the action. The judgment is reversed on the authority of Laramie v. Nicholson, supra, and of Johnson v. The Lower Elwha Tribal Community, 9 Cir., 1973, 484 F.2d 200.

[*317] As in the Laramie ease, we express no opinion on the merits of the case because the trial court did not reach that question. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.