Robert Rasberry v. David Spradling, Etc., 558 F.2d 257 (5th Cir. 1977).
Robert Rasberry v. David Spradling, Etc., 558 F.2d 257 (5th Cir. 1977). Book View Copy Cite
Robert RASBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David SPRADLING, Etc., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
77-1969.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 26, 1977.
558 F.2d 257
Sam F. Baxter, Dist. Atty., Harrison County, Marshall, Tex., for defendants-ap-pellees.
Coleman, Godbold, Per Curiam, Tjoflat.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

This is a § 1983 prisoner civil rights case. Rather than ruling on the sufficiency of the complaint under standards of Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), the court referred the matter to a Magistrate who made an independent, ex parte factual investigation, including interviews of one or more witnesses.

The Magistrate concluded that plaintiff could not prove any set of facts that would entitle him to recover, and recommended that the case be dismissed as frivolous. The district court accepted the recommendation and dismissed the suit as frivolous. This does not comport with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the governing case law.

VACATED and REMANDED for reconsideration under correct legal standards.