Calvin Young v. Ralph Gray, Individually & as Med. Dir., Texas Dep't of Corr., 560 F.2d 201 (5th Cir. 1977).
Calvin Young v. Ralph Gray, Individually & as Med. Dir., Texas Dep't of Corr., 560 F.2d 201 (5th Cir. 1977). Book View Copy Cite
Calvin YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ralph GRAY, Individually and as Medical Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee
77-1493.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 30, 1977.
560 F.2d 201
Calvin Young, pro se., John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., David M. Kendall, Ben M. Harrison, Joe B. Dibrell, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., Art Kei-narth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Huntsville, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Goldberg, Clark, Fay.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Appellant Calvin Young is a Texas prisoner. In his handwritten, pro se complaint he alleged that he fell from a trailer and injured his head. He acknowledged that the prison medical authorities provided treatment for the resulting headaches but denied that their treatment was adequate. He asserted that the improper treatment violated the eighth and fourteenth amendments and that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provided him a remedy. The district court dismissed the complaint. We affirm.

A prisoner does not state an eighth amendment claim by alleging “an inadvertent failure to provide adequate medical care”. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 105, 97 S.Ct. 285, 292, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976). Rather, “a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” Id. Appellant’s allegations, less extensive than those found wanting in Gamble, fail to meet these standards. Here, as in Gamble, the bare allegation that the doctor should have undertaken additional diagnostic measures does not state an eighth amendment claim.

AFFIRMED.