United States v. William Judson Shima, 560 F.2d 1287 (5th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. William Judson Shima, 560 F.2d 1287 (5th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Steve Tristan Vasquez, Alfredo Paul Guajardo, and Daniel Gomez, Jr. (ca5, 1992-01-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Steve Tristan Vasquez, Alfredo Paul Guajardo, and Daniel Gomez, Jr.
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shima, 545 F.2d 1026, 1028 (5th Cir.), on reh’g, 560 F.2d 1287 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 996 , 98 S.Ct. 632 , 54 L.Ed.2d 490 (1977) (citation omitted) (burden on Government to show that exception existed).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William Judson SHIMA, Defendant-Appellant
76-1778.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 14, 1977.
560 F.2d 1287
1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11181
Tom S. MeCorkle, Jr., Dallas, Tex., (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant., Kenneth J. Mighell, U. S. Atty., John W. Sweeney, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., Judith A. Shepherd, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Brown, Thorn-Berry, Coleman, Goldberg, Ains-Worth, Godbold, Morgan, Clark, Ingraham, Roney, Gee, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

This case was orally argued en banc on September 26, 1977.

The panel opinion, affirming the judgment of the district court, is reported, 545 F.2d 1026 (1977).

Upon rehearing en banc, the Court is of the opinion that the prerequisite exigent circumstances, coupled with probable cause, were amply demonstrated in this case on facts set forth in the panel opinion.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.