Jose Rodriguez v. F. Ray Marshall, Sec'y of Labor, Henry Rothell, Etc., 579 F.2d 376 (5th Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Jose Rodriguez v. F. Ray Marshall, Sec'y of Labor, Henry Rothell, Etc., 579 F.2d 376 (5th Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jose RODRIGUEZ Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
F. Ray MARSHALL, Secretary of Labor, Defendant-Appellant, Henry Rothell, Etc., Et Al., Defendants
76-2866.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 31, 1978.
579 F.2d 376
Charles G. Preston, Asst. Counsel for Litigation and Jonathan H. Waxman, Counsel for Litigation, U. S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., with whom Carin Ann Clauss, Sol. of Labor, Craig A. Berrington, Associate Sol. of Labor, Nathaniel Baccus III, Associate Sol., on the brief, William Kanter, Edwin E. Huddleson, III, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellants., James A. Herrmann, Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc., Harlingen, Tex., H. Michael Sem-ler, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appel-lees.
Godbold, Simpson, Morgan.
Published
PER CURIAM:

This case was filed by a migrant farm worker attempting to compel the official charged with enforcement of the Wagner-Peyser Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 49 et seq. (1973), to exercise their statutory authority under the Act. A trial was held resulting in judgment for the plaintiff. During the penden-cy of this appeal, the Department of Labor issued new regulations under the Act. 20 CFR § 653.108 et seq. Both parties suggest that these regulations address all the issues raised before this court, and that the case is

[*377] now moot. We agree. Diffenderfer v. Central Baptist Church, 404 U.S. 412, 92 S.Ct. 574, 30 L.Ed.2d 567 (1972); McRae v. Hogan, 576 F.2d 615 (5th Cir., 1978); Concerned Citizens of Vicksburg v. Sills, 567 F.2d 646 (5th Cir. 1978). Accordingly, the order of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss.

VACATED and REMANDED.