United States v. Cornelius J. Kehoe & Ray K. Bullock, 579 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1978).
Search
United States v. Cornelius J. Kehoe & Ray K. Bullock, 579 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1978). Book View Copy Cite
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Cornelius J. KEHOE and Ray K. Bullock, Defendants-Appellants
76-4346.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 5, 1978.
579 F.2d 971
James J. Hippard, Houston, Tex., for Cornelius Kehoe., Randy Schaffer, Houston, Tex., for Ray K. Bullock., J. A. Canales, U. S. Atty., Mary L. Sin-derson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for United States.
Goldberg, Morgan, Per Curiam, Wyzanski.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

In United States v. Kehoe, 573 F.2d 335 (5th Cir. 1978), we reviewed several alleged errors including defendants’ claim that their conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 657 violated double jeopardy. While rejecting the defendants’ other contentions, we relied on United States v. Jenkins, 420 U.S. 358, 95 S.Ct. 1006, 43 L.Ed.2d 250 (1975) to hold that the § 657 conviction abridged the Double Jeopardy Clause. Subsequently, the Supreme Court expressly overruled Jenkins in United States v. Scott, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978). The portion of our opinion relying on Jenkins, 573 F.2d at 340-346, must be vacated in light of Scott. We now hold that the defendants’ conviction did not violate double jeopardy and we therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.