Peggy Tams, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Raymond E. Tams, Deceased, Complainant-Respondent,
v.
Morton Abrams, Ramos & Company, Incorporated, a New Jersey Corporation, and Paramount Investment Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
v.
Morton Abrams, Ramos & Company, Incorporated, a New Jersey Corporation, and Paramount Investment Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
Apr 24, 1936.
Messrs. Schotland Schotland , for the defendant-appellant Paramount Investment Corporation.
Messrs. Osborne, Cornish Scheck and Mr. Ervin S. Fulop , for the complainant-respondent.
PER CURIAM..
The pleadings and proofs in this case have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the vice-chancellor are abundantly supported by the evidence adduced.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.