Thomas Earl Henderson, Jr. v. Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist., 584 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1978).
Search
Thomas Earl Henderson, Jr. v. Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist., 584 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1978). Book View Copy Cite
⚠ Negative Treatment Vacated 3 negative, 1 positive ▼
Thomas Earl HENDERSON, Jr., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
77-2839.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 17, 1978.
584 F.2d 115
Art J. Brender, Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants., John A. Buckley, American Civil Liberties Foundation of Texas, Inc., Austin, Tex., for amicus curiae, American Civil Liberties et al., Cecil A. Morgan, David B. Owen, Fort Worth, Tex., for Fort Worth Independent School Dist. et al.
Ains-Worth, Brown, Clark, Coleman, Gee, Godbold, Goldberg, Per Curiam, Roney, Thorn-Berry, Tjoflat.
Cited by 22 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

In this case, a panel of the Court affirmed the district court by a written opin [*116] ion. Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School District, 574 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1978). A petition for rehearing en banc was granted, which effectively vacates the panel opinion as a citable precedent. With the panel opinion vacated, the en banc court has reached an even division as to the issues raised on appeal. Thus, the district court is affirmed by operation of law, and the decision of the court of appeals has no prece-dential value.

AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW.