James Chang v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., & United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 677 F.2d 173 (1st Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
James Chang v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., & United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 677 F.2d 173 (1st Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. Frank, 702 F. Supp. 14 (D. Mass. 1988)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 174 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • Williams v. Frank, 702 F. Supp. 14 (D. Mass. 1988).published
    Wiggins v. United States Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219 (5th Cir.1981), cited with approval in Chang v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 677 F.2d 173, 174 (1st Cir.1982).
  • Andrew L. Tolliver v. James Deniro, Dir. of Vets. Admin. Med. Ctr., Palo Alto, California, 790 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir. 1986).published
    See Doyal v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 1526, 1536-37 (11th Cir.1985); Williams v. Department of Army, 715 F.2d 1485, 1488-91 (Fed.Cir.1983) (en banc); Hayes v. United States Government Printing Office, 684 F.2d 137, 139-40 (D.C.Cir.1982); Chang v. M…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James CHANG, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents
81-1596.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
May 10, 1982.
Published opinion
677 F.2d 173
1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19374
Scott Kalish, San Juan, P. R., on brief, for petitioner., Corneilus T. Cashman, Gen. Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, on brief, for respondent.
Coffin, Campbell, Breyer.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We conclude, in agreement with the decisions in Wiggins v. United States Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1981) and Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981), that mixed cases involving both claims of discrimination and of improper agency action must be brought as one action in the district court. Accordingly we lack jurisdiction over the petition and it is therefore dismissed.