Harry R. Back, and with him H. Jerome Jaspan, for appellants. — The provisions in the lease do not exempt the landlord from injuries resulting from his negligence: Charlow v. Blankenship, L.R.A. 1917 D. 1149; Worthington v. Parker, 11 Daly (N.Y.) 545; Randolph v. Feist, 52 N.Y. 109 ; Second United Cities Realty Corp. v. Hare, 165 N.Y. Supp. 371; Moroder v. Fox, 155 Wisc. 503- 143 N.W. 1040; Fera v. Child, 115 Mass. 32 Ruff Drug Co. v. Iowa Co., 15 A.L.R., 962; LeVette v. Hardman Est., 1917 B.L.R.A., 222. Charles H. Goren, and with him Nathaniel I.S. Goldman, for appellees. — The contract was valid and relieved the lessors from all liability to their tenants: Rose v. Finance Company, 21 Dist. Reports 490.

PER CURIAM, December 10, 1926..

Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published