green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Anderson v. Charleston Capital Corp. (In Re D.A. Kennerly)
As stated in McConnell v. Kitchens, 20 S.C. 430 (1884), “The general rule, undoubtedly, is, that a contract to do an act which is prohibited by statute, or which is contrary to public policy, is void, and cannot be enforced in a court of justice.” See also, Grant v. Butt, 198 S.C. 298 , 17 S.E.2d 689, 693 (1942); and Batchelor v. American Health Insurance Company, 234 S.C. 103 , 107 S.E.2d 36 (1959).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pendarvis v. Berry
Rep. 845 , and Grant v. Butt, 198 S. C. 298, 17 S. E. (2d) 689 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
W & N Construction Co. v. Williams
(2×)
See also Grant v. Butt, 198 S.C. 298 , 17 S.E. (2d) 689 (1941); Rountree v. Ingle, 94 S.C. 231 , 77 S.E. 931 (1913).
Grant
v.
Butt.
v.
Butt.
Dec 1, 1941.
Mr. A.R. McGowan, Mr. Irving Steinberg , and Mr. W. Turner Logan, Jr. , all of Charleston, for appellant, cite: As to demurrer: 21 R.C.L., 504-510, Tit. \Pleading\"
Stukes, Bonham, Messrs, Baker, Fishburne, Bellinger.
Secs. 69-70; 192 S.C. 373 ; 6 S.E.2d 750 and 751; Code 1932
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This Court is in full accord with the result of the judgment of the Circuit Court reached on several grounds in the order of Special Judge George Bell Timmerman sustaining the demurrer to the complaint. This order sufficiently states[*313] the pleadings and issues; it will be reported. Appellant’s exceptions thereto have been carefully considered and are overruled and the judgment below affirmed.