Mr. G.M. Greene , for appellant, submits: Burden of proof was shifted to wife to show that property conveyed to her was paid for with funds belonging to her separate estate: 1 Moore, Fraud. Conv., p. 39, sec. 6; 94 U.S. 580 ; 27 S.C. 425 . Grantee knew of her husband's intent in making conveyances: Bump. Fraud. Conv. (4th ed.), sec. 2; 2 Bail. 324; 1 Hill 380; 97 S.C. 31 . Burden also on grantee to show that creditor had notice of facts to put him on notice more than six years before action: 8 Rich. Eq. 155; Smith on Frauds, sec. 87; 101 U.S. 135 ; 44 S.C. 381 . Evidence of grantee's knowledge of fraud: ; Smith on Frauds, sec. 249. Messrs. Hendersons and Bates Simms , for respondents, cite: As to limitation of action: 77 S.C. 541; 101 U.S. 135 . Laches: McM. Eq. 134; 24 S.C. 99 ; 21 S.C. 124 ; 93 U.S. 55 .

MR. JUSTICE GAGE..

and that the estate of Sloan